Page 1 of 2
Which sitemap is better for Google?
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:04 am
by divyansh
In my point of view sitemap.xml is better than sitemap.html
But I need your suggestions. Thanks..
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:52 am
by franky123
I also think that sitemap.xml is better than sitemap.html. Not only me but also a big number of webmaster prefer to xml sitemap.
xml sitemap is better
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:28 am
by ciidoctor
xml sitemap is better
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:54 pm
by solar_power
I think xml is the better one.
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:16 pm
by medbook
Thanks for the info, I will using xml sitemap
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:21 pm
by VladTepes
Both are useful and have special functions for our sites, mostly when used properly.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:31 am
by wildnettechnologies
XML sitemap is the best for google.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:54 am
by doomcashdown
Well, answers had been given, so I'll just support them. Xml sitemaps are recommended by Google.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:46 pm
by RoscoeRollOff
I been using sitemaps that are recommended by Google.
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:27 am
by rashiya
Both Xml and html sitemaps are good but still I think Google gives a bit more preference to Xml sitemaps.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:31 am
by ForumMaster
Xml and html sitemaps both of good but Xml is better than html.
I prefer Xml sitemap.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:10 am
by Lingua21
Google actually likes both and you can watch a clip about it at the Google Webmaster Central Channel on Youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Goo ... i5DGOu1uA0
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 1:55 am
by Organs
Use Google sitemap generator. it is the best.
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:17 pm
by Thizzle
I don't think it matters, its more whats easier for you than anything.
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:26 am
by ukhotels
xml sitemap is for search engine purpose, and html sitemap is for user purpose.