Page 1 of 1
HTML vs Other Technics, any help from SEO?
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 pm
by peterko
I've heard, the sites written in HTML have greater priorities by search engines, comparing to other technologies.
If that is true, then here is another question, if the site has already been written in different coding technology, what can be done to improve the status to make it (if not equal) but close to html priority status? (Hopfully the site doesn't have to be overwritten in HTML)
Guess it's a stupid question, but any idea?
Have a great day,
Peter
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:37 pm
by skysoldier
I think it will be more SE friendly if it is in <div> form.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:36 am
by peterko
leftybogs wrote:well HTML are more easy crawl.. but doesn't mean that crawler prioritize it... besides you can't create a full functional site with the use of html alone...
It sounds like nonsense. As you say it, HTML are more easy crawl but the crawler does not prioritize it.
Hope you will agree with me, who cares about easy crawling if it doesn't make any difference in terms of priorities or other benefits?
Have a great day,
Peter
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:55 am
by webonlineset
Hi, HTML made pages are certainly loved by the searched engine because they are static and can get indexed faster than the dynamic pages.
But when it comes to rankings, there is no difference because links can determine the importance of websites.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:41 pm
by ben_tambling
tough question huh! its hard to think what are we going to do if we don't have any idea of what kind of coding we will use..
but if there will be a possibility to simplify the codings closely to html,, then that's the best possible thing to do...
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:43 am
by erikko
css and php coded sites are much better than pure html alone
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:14 am
by skysoldier
Regarding on the speed of a page will load, I prefer <div> better than HTML!